Knowledge Knowledge Gaps

Question not answered.Don't just stay in the chat record.

Repeatedly asked by visitors, sentences that are rejected or poorly answered by the knowledge base contribute to the knowledge gap. Checking permissions can be seen in the list, promoting the problem to a draft FAQ, and then following clearance.

Source

The gap comes from real conversation, not from product managers.

There is a "knowledge gap" in the back office knowledge group. Deposition by site: original sentence, cause, source list. The noise can be removed in bulk. When you have write permissions, the first key generates the FAQ draft, and you are still waiting for the release to avoid unreading the content immediately.

  • This page needs to be examined / live.qa permissions
  • The desk also has a knowledge gap view that allows agenting to be marked.
  • The issue title can be changed when promoted and the target knowledge pool selected
  • Retrieving test hit rate; gap pages follow sentences that are not answered.
Real console of the knowledge gap: a summary of the questions repeatedly asked by visitors but not answered by the knowledge base

Closed

After promotion, check with the sandbox

Once the draft has been released and the vector has been re-established, a search assessment is used to see if the rejection rate has come down, and the original sentence is run again in a sandbox. Don't write down the agenting habits in FAQ; that's about the jargon. FAQ External, speech to man.

PermissionsQualifications are visible; writing knowledge is necessary for promotion.
SegregationOnly the gaps in the station or the assigned site are listed.
NoiseTest questions, insults and meaningless sentences may be deleted in bulk.
Nope.It is not a worksheet system, nor is it a substitute for agenting.
Retrieval of sample rejection and reference rates to verify whether gaps have been filled

Next

Fill the knowledge base or try again with a different strategy